Second Eastern European Conference on Rare Diseases and Orphan Drugs

The conference will be carried out on 8-9 September 2006 in the beautiful town of Plovdiv (Bulgaria) under the auspices of the Bulgarian Ministry of Health. It is organized by the Information Centre for Rare Diseases and Orphan Drugs - a project of the Bulgarian Association for Promotion of Education and Science.

This event is a logical continuation of the very successful First Eastern European Conference on Rare Diseases and Orphan Drugs, which took place on 27 May 2005 in Plovdiv, Bulgaria. The aim of this first and very important conference was to raise governmental and public awareness in Eastern Europe on rare diseases and orphan drugs.

For more information: http://www.conf2006.raredis.org/mission.php

Online shopping for Hospital Pharmacists from EAHP

All Hospital Pharmacists, members of the EAHP (European Association of Hospital Pharmacists) can now purchase publications produced by the
ASHP (American Association of Health System Pharmacists) at reduced prices. This is due to an agreement between EAHP και της ASHP.

The EAHP, in co-operation with Frismedia and Bibit, done everything to make sure that payment by credit card can be done safely through this website and delivery to your address is guaranteed.


Sources

EAHP http://www.eahp.eu
EAHP Bookstore http://www.eahp.eu/asp/bookstore.asp?m=8
ASHP http://www.ashp.org/
Frismedia http://www.frismedia.nl/main.html
Bibit http://www.bibit.com/

Hospital Pharmacies in the European Union

European Association of Hospital Pharmacists (EAHP) in colaboration with European Hospital and Healthcare Federation (Hope), published in 2002 a booklet under the title " Hospital Pharmacies in the European Union".

We give here the address from where you can download it because many of our colleagues are searching around the web to find it. We hope it will be a great source of information.

Sources

Booklet
http://www.hope.be/07publi/07newpublics/HosPharma.pdf

Hope
http://www.hope.be/

EAHP
http://www.eahp.eu

European Union gives boost to orphan drugs development

EU incentives for R&D on orphan drugs have proven successful, 22 new drugs have reached the market in five years. Patient organisations argue they cannot afford them.

More than 450 applications for orphan designation have been submitted between April 2000 and April 2005 and, of those, more than 260 have been designated and 22 have gone on to receive a marketing authorisation," concludes a Commission report on the impact of the first five years of the EU's orphan medicine regulation.

According to the Commission, the response to the orphan legislation, which provides for the pharma companies a 10-year market exclusivity for the orphan medicinal products, reduction of EMEA fees and support for R&D, has "far exceeded initial expectations".

Biotech industry has welcomed the report acknowledging the progress made, but states that "timely and equitable access for patients to the approved medicines remains an issue". It also claims that "additional economic incentives in most member states are still needed as some member states are delaying reimbursement of orphan drugs, thus limiting patient access to these drugs".

Eurodis, the umbrella patient organisation for rare disease patients in Europe, states that, often, when the products are available, patients cannot afford them, which is "not only inequitable because patient access to orphan drugs depends on the country where they live, but it is also totally unethical".

Links

EU official documents

Commission Staff working document: on the experience acquired as a result of the application of Regulation (EC) No 141/2000 on orphan medicinal products and account of the public health benefits obtained (Document on the basis of Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 141/2000) (27 June 2006)
Commission Staff working document: Outcome of the consultation (3 June 2006)
Commission press release: Fighting rare diseases: 22 new orphan drugs in five years (26 June 2006) [FR] [DE]
Commission: Rare diseases
European Medicines Agency (EMEA)
CORDIS News: Orphan medicine legislation spurs on research, innovation and growth, claims report (27 June 2006)

Industry Federations
EuropaBio - European Biopharmaceutical enterprises joint press release: Orphan Medicines Regulation for rare diseases on the road to success (27 June 2006)

NGOs
European Organisation for Rare Diseases (Eurodis): Improving patient access to orphan drugs in Europe (April 2006)

ASHP Guidelines on Handling Hazardous Drugs

Developed by the ASHP Council on Professional Affairs and approved by the ASHP Board of Directors on January 12, 2006

In 1990, the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP) published its revised Technical Assistance Bulletin (TAB) on handling cytotoxic and hazardous drugs. The information and recommendations contained in that document were current to June 1988. Continuing reports of workplace contamination and concerns for health care worker safety prompted the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) to issue new guidelines on controlling occupational exposure to hazardous drugs in 1995. In 2004, the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) issued the “NIOSH Alert: Preventing Occupational Exposure to Antineoplastic and Other Hazardous Drugs in Health Care Settings.”

The following ASHP Guidelines on Handling Hazardous Drugs include information from these recommendations and are current to 2004.

The purpose of these guidelines is to
(1) update the reader on new and continuing concerns for health care workers handling hazardous drugs and
(2) provide information on recommendations, including those regarding equipment, that have been developed since the publication of the previous TAB.

Because studies have shown that contamination occurs in many settings, these guidelines should be implemented wherever hazardous drugs are received, stored, prepared, administered, or disposed. Comprehensive reviews of the literature covering anecdotal and case reports of surface contamination, worker contamination, and risk assessment are available from OSHA, NIOSH, and individual authors. The primary goal of this document is to provide recommendations for the safe handling of hazardous drugs.

These guidelines represent the recommendations of many groups and individuals who have worked tirelessly over decades to reduce the potential harmful effects of hazardous drugs on health care workers.

The research available to date, as well as the opinions of thought leaders in this area, is reflected in the guidelines. Where possible, recommendations are evidence based. In the absence of published data, professional judgment, experience, and common sense have been used.

You can download the complete Guidelines from the address:
http://www.ashp.org/bestpractices/new/Haz_AJHP.pdf

The ASHP Guidelines on Handling Hazardous Drugs together with the Quality Standards for Oncology Pharmacy Services (QUAPOS3, ESOP - European Society of Oncology Pharmacy - http://www.esop.li/index.html (http://ehpb.blogspot.com/2006/02/quapos-3-quality-standard-for-oncology.html) are the necessary documents for every Hospital Pharmacists.

Sources

ASHP

http://www.ashp.org/bestpractices/new/Haz_AJHP.pdf

Europeans find medical errors an important problem

The first survey ever on citizens' perceptions and experiences of medical errors in the EU shows that nearly 80% of Europeans find medical errors an important problem in their country.

A recent Eurobarometer survey on the perception of medical errors by Europeans reveals that almost four in five EU citizens (78%) classify medical errors as an important problem in their country. In Italy (97%), Poland (91%) and Lithuania (90%), the great majority of the respondents evaluated the problem as 'important'. Finland and Denmark clearly stand out from the other countries as their citizens (51% and 48% respectively) do not consider medical errors to be an imminent issue in their country.

According to the survey, most EU citizens trust medical professionals not to make a mistake while treating their patients. Dentists are the most trusted category with 74% of Europeans having confidence in them. However, many respondents doubted the quality of health care provided by other medical professional groups. This, according to the survey results, implied that "trust in the functioning of health care systems could be improved."

Q8 How worried should hospital patients be about serious medical errors?




48% of the EU citizens state that hospital patients should be worried about the possibility of a serious medical error whereas a very slight majority of 49% says the opposite.

Those living in Greece (75%), Latvia (74%) and Italy (69%) feel the most concerned, 28% of Greeks, 26% of Latvians and 17% of Italians rating as very worried. The highest share of those being very worried is found in Cyprus, the score reaching 31%.
The citizens of Sweden (20%), Austria (24%) and the Czech Republic (30%) remain less concerned.

Even if direct comparison with the question of citizens’ personal level of concern of suffering a serious medical error (Q7) is not reliable here, it can be pointed out that when the respondents are asked how worried a hospital patient should be to suffer a serious medical error, they seem to be more concerned about the possibility of a medical error than when they asked in the personal dimension.

All in all, it can be roughly generalised that citizens of Southern Europe and new Member States around the Baltic Sea appear to be somewhat more concerned of the safety of hospital patients while citizens of Western Europe, in particular of the Nordic Member States, seem to have more confidence in their healthcare system.

The findings of socio-demographic analysis are consistent with the already observed patterns though the tendencies are somewhat weak. Women, those in the two oldest age groups and less educated respondents express slightly more concern than their counterparts while managers and students remain less worried about the issue.

What comes to the cross-tabulation of questions, the same remarks can be made as
with the previous question but the differences are even stronger. A clear majority of those rating the problem as important also expresses concern over the safety of hospital patients and, as expected, this is also the case for those who have personal experiences of medical errors.

The Commission is set to integrate the results of this first analysis into the work of the patient safety working group.

Source

Eurobarometer: Special Eurobarometer on Medical Errors (January 2006) [FR] [DE]